Blog
Our "AI" Transformation — Part 1b: From Consuming to Sustaining, The Limits of the Doughnut
18 October 2026 · Adriaan Ligtenberg · 2 min read
Part 1b of Our "AI" Transformation. From Consuming to Sustaining: why Kate Raworth's Doughnut Economy is an invaluable map, but not the solution.
Our "AI" Transformation: From Consumption to Sustainability to Regeneration, Recognising Our Place in Nature. A two-part civilizational manifesto. This is Part 1b.
To step out of this artificial separation and find our place within the living web—the interconnected network of ecosystems and life-support systems that sustains us—we must understand the progression of our relationship with the Earth: we must move from Consuming to Sustaining, and ultimately rise to Regeneration or even better Bewildering.
For generations, our dominant mode of existence has been Consuming—an extractive, ego-driven paradigm where we routinely take more than we give, treating the planet as a silent warehouse. This unchecked extraction has pushed us to a precipice; natural scientists have now quantified our biophysical limits and revealed that seven of the eight globally quantified safe and just Earth system boundaries have already been transgressed.
In response to this crisis, progressive thinkers have attempted to transition humanity into the phase of Sustaining. The most prominent framework for this phase is Kate Raworth's Doughnut Economy, which visualizes a safe and just space for humanity bounded by an inner social foundation of human rights and an outer ecological ceiling.
Yet by continuously breaching and overriding the boundaries of this outer ecological ceiling, we are triggering nature’s raw power of destruction—manifesting in unprecedented floods, erratic El Niño cycles, catastrophic hurricanes, and runaway wildfires. These escalating disasters are a fierce wake-up call: we must be deeply humbled by the formidable power of nature rather than believing we can tame or control her.
However, we must openly recognize that the Doughnut Economy is not a solution because it does not address the fundamental purpose shift. While the Doughnut is an invaluable diagnostic map for managing resources, it remains trapped in a static, anthropocentric frame. It treats the environment merely as a set of boundaries to be managed so that humans can safely distribute and consume resources within limits. It seeks to optimize our survival on the treadmill rather than asking why we are on the treadmill in the first place. Sustaining is merely about "doing less harm" and maintaining a degraded baseline. It fails to fulfill an intergenerational promise for our children, nor does it shift our core purpose from economic units of labor to active, conscious participants in the biosphere.
Comments (0)
- No comments yet. Be the first.
Get our free newsletter
New insights, events and reports, straight to your inbox.
Subscribe for free